The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus herein is for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:57, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

John Kane-Berman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that Kane-Berman is notable. The article doesn't cite any independent sources, and I couldn't find any. He's an active commenter on South African politics and society, but I see no indication anybody has written about Kane-Berman in some detail. Huon (talk) 21:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just about every result I'm getting are for people named John Kane or John Berman! Wgolf (talk) 22:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Pishcal — ♣ 22:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Pishcal — ♣ 22:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete: I'm seeing the same thing as the nom: a lot of pieces by Kane-Berman, but jack about him. Even if he's in the South African Who's Who, WW has become such a bucketshop in recent decades that it cuts no notability ice with me. Nha Trang ^Allons! 16:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. I found a speech and some essays by him, but only a single blog that mentions him and his work. I'm surprised, since he's in a Who's Who, how little there is available. Bearian (talk) 19:41, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.