The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 06:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Ramos[edit]

John Ramos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article claims subject was featured in the National Gallery of Art, but I cannot find any sources to support this claim. Subject is non-notable beyond that claim. TN‑X-Man 16:22, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 17:14, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I can't find sources for this guy on Google (first hits are facebook and friendster accounts, the rest are hits for nursing board exam passers or unrelated websites.) and the archive of Philippine Daily Inquirer.--Lenticel ^(talk) 23:30, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. —bluemask ^(talk) 07:39, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all; 19 year-old here. Johnbod (talk) 16:08, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not ready for prime time...Modernist (talk) 16:08, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.