The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tawker (talk) 07:02, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

John Sanderson (politician)[edit]

John Sanderson (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

City councillor with no properly sourced indication that he's attained sufficient notability to get past WP:POLITICIAN — article cites only a single local community weekly newspaper for sourcing, and city councillors in non-metropolitan cities do not qualify for articles on here just for being city councillors (and no, the fact that he's running for mayor this year doesn't boost his notability, as candidates do not qualify for articles just for being candidates either.) He'll certainly qualify for an article if he wins election to the mayoralty, but he's not entitled to keep this article in the meantime. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 18:17, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:22, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 06:56, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No indication he passes general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:36, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete subject to re-creation if he wins. Brampton is a city of 523,911 people, so its mayor or other city-wide official might be considered notable. However, we have deleted most candidates' articles who were merely also-rans. Bearian (talk) 22:25, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Northern Antarctica (₵) 03:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.