The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pacific Zen Institute. Redirecting per WP:NSUPER. Consider this a no consensus close with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

John Tarrant[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject appears to fail general notability guidelines - total lack of the independent, reliable references. No evidence that the criteria of WP:AUTHOR met, either. (Declined PROD). ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 04:29, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 04:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 04:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

question Which has the greater notability: Tarrant, or the Pacific Zen Institute--it seems there might be a possible merge. DGG ( talk ) 06:49, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 23:50, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.