The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:05, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

John Wickes[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Not every early American colonist merits an article. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: doesn't meet notability, don't know if it can. The author appears to have left, unless Jonah161 objects, I'd like to request a copy for my userspace. // Timothy :: talk 19:12, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not every colonist is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.