The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret account 15:18, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Joseph[edit]

Juan Joseph (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable DIII athlete. Claim to fame is winning award for best football player in the state of Mississippi. Does not meet WP:ATHLETE. Smashvilletalk 23:52, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HeureusementIci (talk) 22:45, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • It is given to the best player in Mississippi. That's a pretty limited criteria. --Smashvilletalk 20:57, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The award may be fairly important, but I don't think it qualifies Mr. Joseph for the fairly limited athlete criteria - either playing professionally or at the highest amateur level. Division III is plainly not the highest level of amateur football, and Mr. Joseph has not played professionally. HeureusementIci (talk) 22:43, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:16, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • You have to keep that WP:ATHLETE is just an expression of WP:N that pertains to athletes; it is not the authority 100% of the time for athletes. He became notable by winning a major award, which gives way to a variety of reliable sources, which in turn prove that he is notable. Tavix (talk) 02:03, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • He won an award as the best football player in Mississippi. That is not a major award. As I said above, the award is based on the extremely limited criteria that the player must be an athlete in Mississippi. And considering the only thing he can claim notability for is being an athlete, WP:ATHLETE most definitely applies. We don't consider the winner of the Gagliardi Trophy automatically notable...so we wouldn't consider the winner of an in-state award notable. --Smashvilletalk 02:10, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Mizu onna sango15Hello! 02:26, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.