The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of unexplained sounds. Tim Song (talk) 03:04, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Julia (unidentified sound)[edit]

Julia (unidentified sound) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unidentified sound which does not meet WP:N - no significant coverage in reliable sources. Nothing comes up through Google Scholar/Books. Claritas (talk) 19:55, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I think that www.pmel.noaa.gov qualifies as a reliable source. This stub article should be kept as part of a collective of unidentified sounds - others of which are listed in the article and have been categorized. Moorsmur (talk) 20:50, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's certainly a WP:RS, but I wouldn't consider that significant coverage. Claritas (talk) 21:12, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge It has WP:RS and WP:V, might be a good candidate for Bioacoustics or Acoustical_oceanography, or concantate all the unidentified sounds article into one since they are all stubs.--Savonneux (talk) 22:49, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about it, it might be suitable to merge and redirect all these non-notable unidentified sounds into List of unexplained sounds, with the exception of Bloop, which did receive significant coverage. Claritas (talk) 09:59, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge, whichever. I've also tagged the article for ((Rescue)). __meco (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect into the aforementioned list of unexplained sounds. --Grahamdubya (talk) 17:37, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge - I was unable to find any secondary coverage, the NOAA is a primary source and doesn't confer necessary notability. - LuckyLouie (talk) 13:55, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.