The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:52, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Could you elaborate on why indiaglitz is not a reliable source? Secret of success (talk) 18:18, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article does not meet any citeria mentioned under WP:NFF. Websites like "Indiaglitz" and "Behindwoods" aren't reliable. To understand what are reliable sources, I suggest you to go through this. --Thalapathi(Ping Back) 14:16, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this film is no where near "confirmed" - it's just an idea at the moment. As with all other movies, ideas can be shelved or dropped due to various reasons until filming has begun. On a side note, IndiaGlitz and Behindwoods are reliable, they are not fan sites, spam sites, or blogs. They report the regular news in cinema, like Sify Movies, Rediff, MSN Movies, etc. as effective secondary sources. The problem here is that Secret of Success has misinterpreted them, clearly the sources imply that further information is yet to come and filming hasn't yet been scheduled. EelamStyleZ (talk) 16:14, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per WP:NFF, WP:TOOSOON, WP:CRYSTAL etc. And yes, as Eelamstylez noted, IndiaGlitz and Behindwoods are very much reliable sources, but it's simply too early for this article!! Johannes003 (talk) 20:13, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well those two sites maight be reliable only for past events. I personally feel they publish every possible rumoured news often. That's not the case with Sify Movies, Rediff, MSN Movies, etc., --Thalapathi(Ping Back) 04:58, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete stub as simply being too soon. The director has been "planning" this film since at least 2009, and so might merit a mention in his article, but the topic itself currently does not have enough coverage to be enough of an exception to NFF to merit being a separate article. Schmidt,MICHAEL Q. 21:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.