- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:00, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Kantharalak United F.C.[edit]
- Kantharalak United F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability. Sources in the article are blog posts, I can't find anything better online. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 11:57, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 12:07, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 12:07, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:09, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @Aquaelfin, Please see WP:BLOGS, this source is very far from being a reliable source that can count towards notability. Please refrain from creating new articles on these clubs until you understand the rules of what is notable for inclusion and what is not. Most if not all of these recent club creations will need to be deleted. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 21:27, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Is everyone sure we can't keep this because of the logo alone? Fails WP:GNG, WP:FOOTYN, no reliable sources. SportingFlyer talk 04:50, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 09:31, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per everybody. --Dom from Paris (talk) 16:43, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Couldn't identify any third-party coverage. FourFourTwo.com, which is doing profiles for all the teams in the Amateur League, doesn't seem to have got round to profiling the teams in their region yet. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.