The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades^Godric 03:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Karachi United[edit]

Karachi United (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Fails WP:FOOTYN. Störm (talk) 12:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:45, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:45, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:45, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 13:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 16:54, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - sources now found to show notability. GiantSnowman 13:31, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 18:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 02:15, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Keep Per below. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 05:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Agree with other wikipedians. Its not notable per guidelines, so it should be deleted.  M A A Z   T A L K  14:57, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I based my previous vote on the weak references mentioned in the article. But there are some references mentioned in the news like geo [1], the nation [2], The news international [3], so I would change my vote to weak keep.  M A A Z   T A L K  22:54, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Has anyone checked news sources and coverage on this football club before voting? eg. Karachi United make a dream visit to FC Barcelona (SAMAA News), KPT edge Karachi United in Quaid-e-Azam Football (The News), FIFA World Cup Trophy tour to open new avenues for enthusiasts (The Nation) and more. I would advise against blind nominations. Mar4d (talk) 07:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep -- plays at the highest national level: 2016 Pakistan Football Federation Cup. Here's a news article on their women's division: "Karachi United’s women football team is transcending borders and kick-starting a revolution" from Dawn (newspaper). K.e.coffman (talk) 08:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Mar4d and K.e.coffman comments.  samee  ^talk 16:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep reliable sources have been identified above that confirm the club plays at the highest national level Atlantic306 (talk) 16:05, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Article could use improved referencing and expansion, not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 04:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.