- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged BladesGodric 03:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Karachi United (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable. Fails WP:FOOTYN. Störm (talk) 12:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:45, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:45, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:45, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 13:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - sources now found to show notability. GiantSnowman 13:31, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I based my previous vote on the weak references mentioned in the article. But there are some references mentioned in the news like geo [1], the nation [2], The news international [3], so I would change my vote to weak keep. M A A Z T A L K 22:54, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.