The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:22, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Karanvir Bohra[edit]

Karanvir Bohra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The article was vandalized by ChanderForYou by just keeping 3 source in which 1 is invalid. The article fails WP:Notability (people). If the article is not sourced or kept updated its likely to be merged or deleted. Howzat Utseya (talk) 05:42, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep • The subject have significant coverage in reliable source and meets WP:NACTOR . CutestPenguin^Hangout 17:41, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per meeting WP:GNG and WP:ACTOR. On a side note, I think it unusual for a one-day editor's first actions to be deletion nominations. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 18:36, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep ludicrous nomination. Clearly meets WP:ACTOR and WP:GNG. Ravensfire (talk) 19:32, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.