The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page except signature updates.

The result was keep per discussion below, indicating that the subject satisfies the criteria for notability and verifiability. Non-admin close. --jonny-mt 04:08, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kart Fighter[edit]

English: Fighter (delete) – (View log)

Another Chinese ROM pirate that fails verifiability and notability. Wiki22445 (talk) 01:21, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and Improve. While the article is bare bones, since when is Kart Fighter something you can't find plenty of information on?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 02:29, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, does the fact Gamefaqs list this game count for anything?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 02:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. Someoneanother 14:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep A quick Google search has revealed some additional references. The article currently has 6 references, including one published by IGN Entertainment's GameSpy network. While the article is short and definitely needs to be improved, it does not fail verifiability nor notability as claimed by the nominator. FightingStreet (talk) 10:22, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:11, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someoneanother 08:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, per everyone above. - Master Bigode from SRK.o//(Talk) (Contribs) 13:39, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.