The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ _―Œ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 03:21, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kawasaki Snowmobiles[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references or sources listed in the article and is a stub. The only notable thing about this game is that it was made by Data Design Interactive (already nominated by another user for deletion), who is infamous for making games that receive very negative reception. Nilocla ^{♈ ☮} 01:36, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The fact that the company article has been nominated for deletion (consensus there appears to be 'keep' in any case) has no bearing on the notability of this game. Neither does a negative reception. A notability tag informing interested users of the need to improve references might be more appropriate. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 09:31, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Week keep Some reliable coverage, like [1]. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:57, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.