- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 14:15, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Kayla Braffet[edit]
- Kayla Braffet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 23:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 23:31, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 23:31, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:58, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:00, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:00, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete There doesn't seem to be any advance in Braffet's notability since the previous deletion decision. This appears to be eligible for speedy deletion WP:G4. Jack N. Stock (talk) 00:04, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Also agree, this article looks eerily familiar to the one that was deleted a couple months ago. SportingFlyer talk 08:52, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and SALT, fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:26, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Refusal to delete I refuse to delete the page because the personality deserves a wikipedia page. First, it contains 10 references in a specific section attesting that Kayla Braffet is deserving. The references come from Swedish newspapers recognized as reliable sources of information. She recently signed in a big football club. Therefore, erasing this page does not make sense. Because she is known in Sweden and in the world of women's football. It is therefore logical to maintain this page and not to erase it.Susanowoo 00:12, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete reads like WP:PROMO and all the sources look to be WP:ROUTINE Abcmaxx (talk) 18:42, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article says she played for the Chicago Red Stars in the NWSL, which is a WP:FPL. I'm not sure why people are saying she fails WP:NFOOTY. The article needs cleanup, but that's not what AFD is for. Smartyllama (talk) 20:57, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Although playing for the Red Stars would confer notability, I have found no evidence she was anything other than a practice squad player. Therefore, she fails WP:NFOOTY and apparently WP:GNG as well. If someone can provide evidence she actually played a game with the Red Stars, I would reconsider. Smartyllama (talk) 21:02, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the given sources are all WP:ROUTINE, either regular transfer/match coverage or not from independent sources (as with the first and ninth). Just like Smartyllama, I could not find any proof that she actually played in a game for the Red Stars, so she fails WP:NFOOTY as well. 21.colinthompson (talk) 22:03, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.