The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 05:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kdice[edit]

Found while clearing out CAT:CSD. Deletion reason was -- Non-notable game. This is not a valid speedy deletion reason. Therefore I nominated this to afd. Opinions on what to do with this? No Stance —— Eagle (ask me for help) 21:17, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment It could be classified as non-notable web content(a7), although they've cleaned it up enough that I'd say AfD over speedy. I'm going to clean up some grammar that hurts me. Cantras 21:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Yes I did consider that, but I figured that the AfD is the best course of action. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 22:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The game which the article deals with has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the creator of the game. The article itself provides proof via in-line citations. I don't think it should be deleted.--OriginalJunglist 23:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Agent 86 01:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Koweja 03:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per OriginalJungList -Toptomcat 04:06, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dice Wars. This game is a multiplayer near-clone of Dice Wars. --Dhartung | Talk 05:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The independent web sites listed in the 'Critical Acclaim' section felt the game notable enough to comment on. Therefore in accordance with WP:N, the article should stay. ccscott 14:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Seems popular, has 69,700 ghits. FirefoxMan 16:51, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Popular game, several citations, decent article.JudahH 22:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above. Needs cleanup, see WP:CVG for content and style help. --MegaBurn 09:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Whilst none of the 'critical acclaim' links in the article are what I'd describe as acceptable, with the game out for a mere two weeks it's going to take a little longer for some proper reviews to appear. Suggest keeping the article for now and looking for good citations from sites like GameTunnel. QuagmireDog 15:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per the commenters above, appears to be a notable game. Yamaguchi先生 03:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.