The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 01:16, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kelexis Davenport[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a performer, short on biographical detail and long on unencyclopedic statements of his personal opinion — and relying entirely on primary and unreliable sources (blogs, podcasts) with not even one citation to a properly reliable media source. He might possibly qualify for a properly written and properly sourced Wikipedia article, but that's not what this article is. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 21:50, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:04, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:05, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The "Early Life/Career Beginnings" section is a close paraphrasing copyvio from the cited source. The creator has also created Sulka (pornographic actress), which started out much the same way, with cites to blog posts. But now it is a well-sourced article. That could happen with this article as well. But all I could find was one source in Google Books. It doesn't look like enough. I would accept #2C and #3C in WP:NACTOR, but at this time it looks like reliable sources may not exist. Perhaps later. – Margin1522 (talk) 18:03, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 04:08, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deadbeef 05:10, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Becky Sayles (talk) 14:43, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.