The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable politician, scant media coverage and didn't win any election, delete. WooyiTalk to me? 01:01, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, a serial unsuccessful candidate, there appears to be nothing particularly remarkable about him. Lankiveil (talk) 12:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Keep He was considered a serious candidate for the leadership of a serious political party. Past consensus has been to keep leadership candidates for Canadian political parties who have representation in a legislative body. - Jord (talk) 21:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Further, he got 12% of the vote in a four-way race, to a delegated leadership convention, and was endorsed by a former Premier of Nova Scotia, the head of government in the jurisdiction he sought the leadership. - Jord (talk) 21:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Serious candidate for the leadership of a recognized party. CJCurrie (talk) 22:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Jord and CJCurrie. Ground Zero | t 13:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A serially unsuccessful candidate can still be notable. There are enough non-trivial mentions to write a good stub. –Pomte 14:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.