The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, advert. —— Eagle101 ^{Need help?} 03:46, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kernun firewall[edit]

Originally started out as borderline db-spam material but has since been reworked. However, it still shows little evidence of notability; kernun firewall returns just 74 unique Ghits. All but one of the links provided in the article are to the makers' websites and sites only marginally related. Article creator User:Trustednetworksolutions was blocked shortly after creating the article due to a commercial username, but appears to have created a new account User:Pepino Vavra to continue editing, which brings up WP:COI issues. Contested prod. ~Matticus ^T_C 14:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing but a sneaky way to write an advertisment. full of weasel words. --Tainter 14:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just another non-notable software package. -- Jay Maynard 14:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I created the Kernun page because I intended to link it from Firewall page. If someone is interested in the application proxy technology, he or she does not have many options: there are Firewall Toolkit, Gauntlet from TIS, Sidewinder from Secure Computing Corporation, load ballancer from F-5, Cisco ASA, Kernun and what else...? All of them but Kernun are mentioned at wikipedia, so IMHO it is worth existing. Maybe not and just external link from Firewall page is ok? Pepino Vavra 14:12, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is just another software package, but I still think it is notable. But if you measure by number of Ghits only it does loose. Shall it wait till the number of google hits rises? Pepino Vavra 11:33, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete — non-notable Bushcarrot (Talk·Desk) 04:02, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.