The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Scriven[edit]

AfDs for this article:

Footballer who's article is based around him playing against Liverpool for a semi-professional team, failing WP:ONEEVENT. The criteria states; "If reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a particular event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, low profile, then a separate biography is unlikely to be warranted." --Jimbo^[online] 11:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:37, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; fails WP:ONEEVENT as his sole claim to fame is playing in once football match against famous opposition. Giant Snowman 11:38, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:07, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:ATHLETE Niteshift36 (talk) 06:29, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - passes General Notability Guidelines - WP:N - Multiple coverage in reliable sources as linked to from the article. - fchd (talk) 13:30, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:ATHLETE and I believe the press coverage probably falls under WP:ONEEVENT or WP:NOTNEWS. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 22:21, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:ATHLETE as never having played at a fully-professional level. In my opinion, fails WP:ONEEVENT, per the sentence quoted by the nominator. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 07:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all comments above. --Angelo (talk) 12:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.