The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Borderline, but seems to meet GNG and likely WP:CREATIVE as well. Relisting unlikely to generate further comment. (non-admin closure) — InsertCleverPhraseHere ^{(or here)} 07:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Shinick[edit]

Kevin Shinick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mostly unsourced or non-RS sourced information that fails BLP. I did do a search and only found one major source aricle about Kevin Shinick from USA Today. Most other sources are about Superior Carnage comic book or MAD 100 episode on Cartoon Network thus not significant coverage about him. Thus failing WP:Notability particularly significant attention ("sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time") base on the lack of major media articles about him. Spshu (talk) 13:07, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. --Spshu (talk) 13:15, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:11, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Award winner, appears to have sufficinet coverage on multiple projects to be notable. Artw (talk) 18:34, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The single major award won (Primetime Emmy 2010) was for a show (Outstanding Short-Format Animated Program: Robot Chicken) and was not an individual award (say writer or actor). Most coverage is about the projects not on Shinick himself. Spshu (talk) 18:44, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would degree as to the content of the articles and the usefulness of "cannot mention a project" as a guideline. If references were exclusively about one project or if they failed to mention aspects of his life outside of those projects you might have a good merge argument, but as it is neither is the case. Artw (talk) 17:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Both is the case, just being dismissive of my objection doesn't make the article more about him. Spshu (talk) 18:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm seeing a solid WP:GNG pass and no good rationale for deletion, sorry. Artw (talk) 22:05, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep. In addition to USA Today, there's a smattering of press coverage,[1][2] and his roles in the Mad and Robot Chicken TV series, which may constitute a borderline WP:CREATIVE pass. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:09, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.