- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Cosmopolitan Soccer League. Fenix down (talk) 07:50, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- KidSuper Samba AC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nowhere near meeting WP:GNG, coverage is either trivial or not independent, and even the trivial coverage is in sources of unclear reliability. signed, Rosguill talk 03:19, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 03:19, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 03:19, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 03:19, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The Pancrypian-Freedoms are at least three-time national cup winners. SportingFlyer T·C 14:26, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Why are you continually targeting this article for deletion? There are sources cited, far more than some articles like Manhattan SC, and there will only continue to be more as time passes. As user Willbb234 said, if this article were to be deleted then there are others that would need to be deleted as well. Everything in the article is factually correct, has citations, and can also be confirmed by the league's website. The club exists, and having a wikipedia page adds to its credibility, furthering the opportunities for the players at the club. To delete the article would actively harm real people's lives and future possibilities, as the club is a benevolent entity helping people in difficult life circumstances through the sport of soccer. Furthermore, by not allowing the club to have an active wikipedia page, you are hindering the reputation and development of the sport of soccer in the United States. Most clubs operating this high up in a nations league system will have a wikipedia page, and it is important for international player transfers coming from KidSuper Samba that the club has a legitimate web presence. Furthermore, there are clubs playing in the lower divisions of the Cosmopolitan Soccer League that have fewer sources and less professionally maintained article pages, such as Williamsburg International FC. There's no reason to target this harmless article for deletion, please move on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trallazo4567 (talk • contribs) 07:21, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- As nominator, no objection to redirect per the above vote. signed, Rosguill talk 17:06, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.