The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. More than two weeks, and still no one's willing to argue for the article's retention. Deor (talk) 22:38, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kindness UK[edit]

Kindness UK (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mostly self-referenced or unsourced, basically promotional. None of the sources cited give the charity itself any significant coverage, and I can't find any elsewhere. The fact that the founder appears frequently on TV talking about kindness goes to his notability, not that of this organization. Revent (talk) 21:04, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG. Would approach WP:TNT even were it found notable. --j⚛e decker^talk 15:32, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.