The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Dennis - 21:05, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kingsley Chigozie[edit]

Kingsley Chigozie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:44, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following article for the same reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Emeka Darlington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Can you support that claim with reliable sources? Sir Sputnik (talk) 06:20, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
All of these sources describe the league merely as professional. They do not confirm full professionalism as is required per WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't change the fact that the claim to notability remains unsourced per WP:VNT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.