The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural keep. No rationale provided for deletion. (non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 14:09, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kiss My Ass Tour[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 22#Kiss My Ass Tour. Pinging people from RfD: A7V2, HorrorLover555, Thryduulf, Aspects. ^Clyde!_Franklin! 22:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ^Clyde!_Franklin! 22:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural keep given that no one has actually put forward any arguments for deletion of the content at the RfD. I read the "and send to AfD" comments as suggestions should someone actually want the content deleted. If I were the one to close the RfD, I would have left a comment to that effect which could have saved an unnecessary AfD filing. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural keep per Tavix. If you don't think there should be an article about this tour you need to explain why you believe that, ideally with evidence to support your opinions, so that other people can agree or disagree with you. Thryduulf (talk) 22:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There seem to be sources available for this tour (as per the RFD) so I think it is notable. --Bedivere (talk) 02:13, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I was the original editor who redirected the article two and a half years ago as being tagged for using primary sources for twelve years and failing WP:GNG and WP:CONCERT TOUR. Since new, reliable third-party sources have been found, it now passes WP:GNG and WP:CONCERT TOUR. Aspects (talk) 05:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are more sources regarding the tour now than there used to be as what Aspects has said. I have no objections if anyone else says otherwise regarding the article. HorrorLover555 (talk) 08:17, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.