The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 12:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kmag (magazine)[edit]

Kmag (magazine) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

At first read, this seems like a key magazine for the Drum and Bass community. However, I've been unable to dig up any sources that support this. The article has citations that talk about different magazines and fail verification, are dead links and refer to articles in Newspapers that are un-findable. I've been unable to find any reliable sources that talk about this publication except for the journalism.co.uk article that talks about it shutting down. I have can only conclude that it fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. Andy14and16 came to the same conclusion and proposed deletion in 2010 via ((prod)) but the prod was contested. It might be argued that the website that was created when the magazine folded might be notable, but this article is about the magazine - hence the title. The Dissident Aggressor 18:38, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:31, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I could not find anything either, only the website of the journal itself.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.