The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete to save the blushes of an over-enthusiastic newbie on a mission. Guy (Help!) 14:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Koreate[edit]

The term is non-verifiable, not-notable, and if anything is a neologism. Jeff3000 17:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: Author also created List of Korean fabrication in Wikipedia. --Calton | Talk 01:24, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with Jeff absolutely.--Anthony.bradbury 18:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I originally tagged this article with ((prod)). --stephenw32768^{<user page><talk>} 18:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Neologism with only 366 Google hits, few of which even seem related to the use this article's talking about. Looks to me like it's utter rubbish. Heimstern Läufer 21:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. TSO1D 23:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as obvious axe-grinding (see List of Korean fabrication in Wikipedia, by the same author: "draws up the list of Korean fabrication in Wikipedia. If you are student or using Wikipedia for an academic purpose, you MUST not use the topics below as references, otherwise, humiliate yourself in academic field."). --Calton | Talk 01:24, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Yikes. Syrthiss 14:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.