The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE ALL. postdlf (talk) 03:12, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kornelijus Timofejevas[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was: Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully professional league. No reason was given for contesting. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:50, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following articles for the same reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:50, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:50, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:50, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:50, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - all fail WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 21:55, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with User:GiantSnowman. ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 22:49, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - None of the players in the nomination fulfills the notability requirements stated in WP:NFOOTBALL, and since there is no significant coverage in reliable sources they also fail WP:GNG. Tooga - BØRK! 23:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - none of them appear to meet WP:NFOOTBALL, and I can't find anything to suggest they meet WP:GNG.--Unionhawk ^Talk ^E-mail 15:10, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. None of the players have appeared in a fully-professional league, so they fail WP:NFOOTBALL. Neither have any of them received any significant coverage in reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. Argyle 4 Life^talk 16:10, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.