The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted as G3 (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 06:33, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Krum Corporate[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have no opinion on this and am starting it from an IP who feels that this and the Charles Krum are both hoax articles. See User talk:CambridgeBayWeather#Krum Corporate edit CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:53, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also including

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 23:26, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both: apparent hoaxes, although Charles Krum may exist. However, neither he nor his company is mentioned in any of the reflinks at the articles, respectively. Quis separabit? 21:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete both hoaxes, none of the sources mention the subjects, web searches yield zero results except Wikipedia Kraxler (talk) 23:52, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged as G3 as this is obviously a joke. Pinging Hut 8.5 who actually moved the name to a different one. SwisterTwister talk 23:49, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.