The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 22:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kuriakin Zeng[edit]

Kuriakin Zeng (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing here that asserts notability per WP:BIO in this vanity article. JaGa^talk 05:27, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:57, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. While a recipient of several awards, none of them appear to be of the caliber to establish notability. Also, there is a paucity of reliable sources. Moogwrench (talk) 06:23, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:12, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.