The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Titoxd^(?!?) 01:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kurt Meyer (High Commissioner)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP :BIO. Ambassadors are not inherently notable. being ambassador to Cook Islands is a very minor role. LibStar (talk) 14:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 16:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 16:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 16:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Diplomats can be notable if there's enough reliable source coverage of their careers as diplomats to get them over WP:GNG, but are not granted an automatic presumption of notability because diplomat — if you have to park the sourcing entirely on a simple namecheck of his existence in a news blurb which is actually about the appointment of his successor, then you haven't gotten him over the bar. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if he can be sourced properly. Bearcat (talk) 18:51, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:34, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as pointed out above, diplomats are not automatically notable, and this one does not pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:51, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete Sounds [1], [2], like a competent diplomat, just not enough coverage at this point in hi s career for an article.12:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete - No signs of better applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:21, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.