The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 19:27, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Scott[edit]

Kyle Scott (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Subject fails WP:GNG due to a lack of reliable, third-party sources and fails WP:NFOOTY as he has not appeared in a competitive, first-team game for a fully professional club. – PeeJay 12:23, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:01, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:01, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:01, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:04, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Although the player has not made his debut (yet), he has been promoted to the first team of Chelsea F.C, and will (eventually) make his debut at some point this season. He is part of the first team squad of a top level club and that should make him notable enough Alitheboss55 (talk) 13:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong. That makes him not notable unless he makes his debut (If he makes it at some point). That's the guidelines. Kante4 (talk) 14:19, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.