The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Paul M. Hebert Law Center. Any merger from the history is a matter of subsequent discussion. Sandstein 19:18, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LSU Journal of Energy Law and Resources[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

New journal, too young to have become notable yet (only 1 issue published so far). No independent sources, not included in any selective major indexes. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 18:12, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:42, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:42, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:43, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice The following was removed from this discussion without notice being provided.

“

The result was Speedy keep The existence of reliable primary sources, with the topic already covered in the encyclopedia at Paul M. Hebert Law Center, means there is no case for a notability deletion. With no known secondary sources to establish notability, what is needed is a bold redirect. Any newly discovered secondary sources can be used to improve the article at Paul M. Hebert Law Center.(non-admin closure) Unscintillating (talk) 04:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

”

The above was an inappropriate non-admin closure, as it did not fulfill any of the criteria for speedy keeps. Hence why it was reverted. Unscintillating, if you think this should be redirected you should make an explicit !vote for such. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:30, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Paul M. Hebert Law Center or delete. The article doesn't even assert notability. Huon (talk) 23:23, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the publisher. My Google search shows nothing except calls for papers (essentially the equivalent of a press release when it comes to determining notability) and one-off mentions — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:32, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect ~~or delete~~ - this is a student-edited "journal" with one publication. It wouldn't be considered a reliable source, I don't think. This implies that student publications are notable. I don't think that's true. Maybe in the future it will become notable, but not now. Redirect to Paul M. Hebert Law Center, since it's already mentioned there. Star767 01:59, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Paul M. Hebert Law Center; this allows for some limited development there in the meanwhile & can be revisited down the road. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 00:04, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Paul M. Hebert Law Center, per DASonnenfeld (talk · contribs), above. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 04:04, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge rather than redirect, because a link from there to Energy law would be helpful to bring the latter article to GA status. Bearian (talk) 20:33, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify: Are you suggesting that, with the merger of LSU Journal of Energy Law and Resources into the Paul M. Hebert Law Center article, the latter should, in turn, link to Energy law?

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.