 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2009 August 19. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. There are really too few comments to make an informed judgment, but relisting for a fourth time would be impractical; thus, no prejudice towards a speedy renomination. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:53, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
LUPICIA[edit]
- LUPICIA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Prod removed by author. Non-notable tea company, article sourced to press releases. Reads like an ad. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 20:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:38, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:25, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yup, that's non-notable and the sources are frankly rubbish. Delete.—S Marshall Talk/Cont 00:36, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Sources provided are either links to the company website, or are articles that have a significant amount of promotional/information about prices about the company. Non-notable company, no reliable sources. Netalarmtalk 05:31, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep It pains me to disagree with S Marshall, but he's wrong. Notable tea retailer with 90 locations in Asia and several in California. I will try to work it up in the next few days if no one else gets there first. ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:03, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.