The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus herein is for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:32, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lalika[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. I am partially hampered by only reading English, so decided AfD was a fairer option than prod. Boleyn (talk) 19:18, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't think they exist. I'm not saying it's a hoax but.... the Urdu phrase refers to Laleka, which is a village (see Urdu article here: لالیکا). There's no reference to any Lalika or Laleka tribe or people anywhere. Article creator was banned long ago for copyright violations. —Мандичка^YO 😜 08:55, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree, my searches found absolutely nothing to suggest improvement. SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep or redirect to List of Saraiki tribes. The Lalika tribe belongs to Laleka village mentioned by Wikimandia. sami ^talk 13:24, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Samee, thanks for your input. Do you have any reliable sources to verify that it is notable, or that this tribe is a Saraiki tribe or form this village? I'd be happy to change my vote if such things could be established. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:59, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no sources, impossible even to establish the existence of this tribe. Kraxler (talk) 14:31, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.