The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 19:05, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Landboss[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no evidence that the write-up on rigzone.com is independent coverage. According to http://www.rigzone.com/aboutus.asp ,

Becoming a Rigzone member is free and easy - all we ask for is some simple demographic data [...] Members enjoy the ability to: [...] Post equipment ads, company profiles, and event information

I didn't find other independent coverage of this software. This does not appear to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NSOFT. —rybec 14:46, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:51, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:51, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, preferably via G5 as soon as that option is available to us. Kevin Gorman (talk) 15:27, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unless the user is a sockpuppet, we can't delete per G5 as they didn't create this during a block/ban. Ansh6 6 6 20:54, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - fails WP:GNG. Ansh6 6 6 20:54, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found nothing that shows notability. SL93 (talk) 02:37, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. GregJackP Boomer! 20:56, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.