- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). NORTH AMERICA1000 04:31, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Lastrit.es[edit]
- Lastrit.es (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of reliable, secondary coverage per WP:ORG, WP:WEB or WP:GNG. Blogger spotlight on haulix.com is not independent, as Haulix is a self-proclaimed promotional site that hosts promotional or self-generated content (e.g. press releases). Having over 7,000 reviews in and of itself does not demonstrate notability, unless independent sources testify to the significance of the website to the industry. Many mentions of the website are trivial mentions that focus on albums released rather than the website itself. --Animalparty-- (talk) 20:50, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The blog was named Metal Review (metalreview.com) for 12 years. This may account for the difficulty in finding 3rd party references since the blog/domain no longer exists and searching for "metal review" returns far too many irrelevant results. I disagree that the amount of original content doesn't demonstrate notability. I believe it does as it serves as an excellent resource for reviews of metal music albums since 2001. The fact that the editors receive dozens of legitimate promos for review each week from major labels (Metal Blade, Century Media, Profound Lore, Seasons of Mist, etc) shows that the "industry" thinks the blog is relevant. Complicatedgame (talk) 21:25, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 00:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (report) @ 20:21, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.