The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:50, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Latin Areschart[edit]

Latin Areschart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable chart. A few blogspot references, but most of the references are from Wikis and Wikipedia mirrors. Created by the "Latin Music Academy Of America", an organization that I can find no references to at all. Claims to be based on the United World Chart, which is another chart that has been deleted from Wikipedia. —Kww(talk) 13:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —JD554 (talk) 13:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no reliable sources to verify any of the claims in the article or to show notability. A Google search shows very few hits and doesn't provide any suitable sources to indicate notability. --JD554 (talk) 13:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator and User:JD554. (What kind of legitimate chart would use p2p stats in their ranking???) SKS2K6 (talk) 15:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for ridiculous claims. Alexius08 (talk) 23:19, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete What? "Chart rankings are based on radio airplay, vote, paid download or physic sales and P2P." That's so ridiculous! --Smanu (talk) 15:05, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.