The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lazy inheritance[edit]

Lazy inheritance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG. Article was created in 2007 and contains one external reference, a library maintained by the creator of the article. I can find no other mentions of this concept on the web, and it doesn't sound like any other design pattern I can think of, except maybe a bad explanation of dependency injection, which already has a much higher quality article. Also has a redirect pointing at it, Lazy Inheritance. 3mi1y (talk) 00:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. 3mi1y (talk) 00:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 01:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I agree with the nomination. Fails WP:GNG. Fifthapril (talk) 03:43, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Yeah this fails WP:SIGCOV wasn't able to find anything that would change that. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 08:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and the above. BD2412 T 06:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.