The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as A7, article about a company, corporation, organization, or group, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject, by Peridon (talk · contribs). (non-admin closure) Quasi human | Talk 14:15, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Legend Futbol[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

General notability concerns per WP:CORPDEPTH (could also CSD per A7) RA (talk) 11:47, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No assertion of notability, no sources evident through a Google search, no reason to believe sources might exist. Moswento (talk | contribs) 12:22, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — The-Pope (talk) 14:01, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. — The-Pope (talk) 14:02, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Google searches yielded only 6,200 results (failes WP:GNG) consisting almost entirely of non-reliable sources. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 22:58, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, A7. Hairhorn (talk) 02:15, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.