The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:42, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lekshmy Rajeev[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG (non-notable) -- two refs listed in the article are newspaper articles written by him/her but not about him/her. The in-line external link is dead. Google searches have only yielded social contacts. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 07:20, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of subject's notability in article, nor uncovered in searches. Nor even in her self-penned bio here. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 10:46, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 19:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete clearly fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 01:54, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.