The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete without prejudice. Unsourced BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:12, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Les Feldick[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although there are a number of gnews hits for this Bible teacher, they're all just announcements that he'll be at a local church. I don't think that he meets the minimum criteria for inclusion at WP:GNG. Pburka (talk) 02:46, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- The question of notability probably depends on how many people watch his teaching program. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:29, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply. I disagree. The question of notability depends on significant coverage in independent reliable sources per WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Pburka (talk) 18:43, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - What I was implying was that if the programs are well-watched (hundreds of thousands of viewers), they are likely to be notable; if watched by a few thousand they are not. Nevertheless, WP:N and WP:RS are wholly distinct issues. A subject may be notable, though it is hard to find WP:RS. Peterkingiron (talk) 11:28, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →B music ian 01:36, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.