The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Stifle (talk) 10:11, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leslie Segar[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. A single source is given and searches reveal very little else except advertising, IMDB, LInkedin and social media. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 11:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 11:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 11:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 11:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment More than a few mentions of her name in Google News, not sure we have enough to prove notability though. Oaktree b (talk) 14:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:51, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I found many articles about her on Google news and added them in. Article was in poor shape at time of nomination, but is good now. If anyone has access to archive NYT, there is a serious piece about her here: https://www.nytimes.com/1995/04/23/nyregion/making-it-work-the-back-flip-in-hip-hop.html CT55555 (talk) 13:12, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CT55555: @Velella: The article without paywall avaliable here: https://ghostarchive.org/archive/mK1jb?kreymer=true Rlink2 (talk) 16:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Now adequately sourced.--Ipigott (talk) 06:55, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.