The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. This seems to fall under the category of walled garden. Seraphim♥Whipp 17:24, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lethy[edit]

No sources, Google knows nothing about the claimed chart successes. Has already been speedily deleted and recreated twice.

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:

Regards, HaeB (talk) 00:21, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:22, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Promotional article. Who's ever heard of Lethy, apart from her Mum and Dad? --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 00:44, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Very very suspiciously appears as an elaborate hoax. The content does not add up against searches in Google; e.g., "I'd Do It Again For You" moby, which is said to be a remix by Moby yields no results. I can do other examples, but it's pointless—I pretty much need some kind of proof to say it is not a hoax. +mt 03:25, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete How many times do we have to vote to delete an article? Wikipedia is not a crystal ball either. Artene50 (talk) 04:02, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lethy and Catherine Davys (bupkiss on G or GNews). If these go as non-existent than the songs and the album need deleting as well. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.