The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:33, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lidhar[edit]

Lidhar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The only source available appears to be this, which is known to be unreliable per discussions at WT:INB and which, even if it were reliable, is ambiguous re: whether the alleged community is really distinguishable from its alleged Jat brethren or merely a geographical descriptor deployed by the author. Sitush (talk) 10:43, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:22, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:35, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:35, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is a little tricky because there also seems to be a place called Lidhar, and results for the two are hard to separate, but I cannot find reliable secondary coverage. The book Sitush mentions does not strike me as reliable, and the numerous website sources are dodgy in the extreme. Vanamonde93 (talk) 12:51, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Even if the source was reliable, there is nothing preventing this from being included in the Jat people article. Too little material for a stand-alone article. Kingsindian ♝ ♚ 13:06, 21 December 2015 (UTC) Kingsindian ♝ ♚ 13:06, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.