The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Article on an average church with nothing to distinguish it from any other independent church Nyttend 03:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete Possible speedy, doesn't assert notability, reads like spam. faithless(speak) 06:29, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete. No assertion of notability. I concur that there is some non-neutral language, but that's a copyediting thing which can be easily fixed should the article be kept. No objection to recreation with proper sources establishing notability. ZZClaims~ Evidence 13:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.