The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:43, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
This semi-independent kingdom has been defunct since the unification of India. This unsourced article looks like unverifiable original research, including about the supposed royal status of living persons (WP:BLP). See also WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former Austro-Hungarian throne for a similar case. Norden1990 (talk) 08:25, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes). It is impossible to attribute the current line of succession to this throne to WP:RELIABLE sources, because there is no current line of succession, because the princely state itself doesn't even exist anymore. TompaDompa (talk) 17:24, 25 July 2020 (UTC)