The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 20:55, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of Aadhaar-enabled frauds[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was tempted to tag this with ((db-context)) - the author has made no attempt to provide any sort of introduction - could not even link to the Aadhaar article. This is just listcruft - nothing but external links. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:06, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. L293D (☎ • ✎) 15:53, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I would not support a CSD, but it does nothing to explain what the frauds have in common or why they are notable, and needs deleting. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:27, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Definitely would fail A1, as context can be determined from the table headings and the title. However, the list should still be deleted. The list appears to be indiscriminate, without any regard to the notability for the various "frauds" it contains. Ham tech person 21:17, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:32, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS. We don't need a list of every single incident, especially given that none of them are significant enough to warrant a dedicated article. Ajf773 (talk) 04:11, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nuke -- Per all above.Indiscriminate listcruft.I sympathesize with RHaworth's point but this despite being so inherently ridiculous stuff is skillfully written enough to evade our CSDs.And, for the record, any major Aadhar fraud is yet to happen.~ Winged Blades^Godric 17:30, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others. I found via the AfC tags which I removed as this was not handled through AfC where it would have been declined. The creator moved it to article space which includes AfD as a feature. Legacypac (talk) 19:24, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete --Ita140188 (talk) 00:18, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.