- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
List of Alabama Congressional Districts by HDI[edit]
- List of Alabama Congressional Districts by HDI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails policies on lists, original research and raw data Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Not even accurate raw data, this is for last decade's districts. Cardiffbear88, I added related articles by same author to nom. Reywas92Talk 05:55, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you Reywas92 for adding these in - happy to support these additional nominations. I didn’t notice them originally because they weren’t tagged for notability - just the Alabama one was. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 07:56, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per nom, WP:OR data should not exist on Wikipedia. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 06:22, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete: I couldn't get to a lot of the data, the link gave me "The Wayback Machine has not archived that URL." The material I did get to was 10+ yrs old and the list didn't match in some cases and in other cases was incomplete. I'm not sure these lists would ever be kept up to date. Data that is a couple years out of date would be okay but not great, but 10yrs is simply misinformation. This is more like List of districts by HDI in 2009 and published in 2010. Just because a list can exist, doesn't mean it should exist and in this case WP:TNT is what I think. Statistics and demographics can go into lists such as Alabama's congressional districts if there is a consensus to add it. This is where it has a better chance of remaining updated. // Timothy :: talk 03:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Seems to be WP:SYNTH. pburka (talk) 20:19, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if this were accurate and sourceable and useful, it would be a merge to the per-state congressional district page. As far as I can tell, it's neither sourceable nor useful, and a decade out of date. A clear delete. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:59, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:RAWDATA. Ajf773 (talk) 21:22, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.