The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 15:42, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Algerian Ligue Professionnelle 1 players

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Algeria national football team season, this article was mentioned as having very doubtful notablility. There is no evidence that it passes WP:GNG and the sourcing for individual footballers does not prove that the list is complete. How can we be sure that all players are listed and none has been missed? I think it should be deleted, it is simple not notable Qed237 (talk) 20:17, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Qed237 (talk) 20:18, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:32, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:32, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:32, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - this is a list of players who have played in a fully-professional league, in the same way as List of Premier League players is. Why is one questioned but the other not? Needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 09:03, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per GS, lists of players in fully professional leagues are deemed notable. The fact that it may be incomplete is no reason for deletion, if there is a concern about this, it can simply be hatted at the head of the article. Fenix down (talk) 07:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:08, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.