The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:21, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Australia One Day International matches[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is just a list and fails WP:NOTSTATS, WP:NOTMIRROR and WP:NOTDIRECTORY Domdeparis (talk) 17:29, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not much to say, I think the nomination hits the nail on the head. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:42, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 19:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 19:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 19:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If you want to find a result from any ODI Australia have played in, then use Cricinfo. We're not a directory unlike them, and all we're doing here is refactoring their content. Joseph2302 19:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all the above. WP:NOTSTATS has become a problem in the cricket portfolio. What has happened to narrative? Jack | ^{talk page} 19:12, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is what sites such as espncricinfo is for, not Wikipedia. WP:NOTMIRROR. Ajf773 (talk) 19:30, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOSTATS. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 08:30, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Then why page List of Indian Test matches is not termed as WP:NONSTATS? Please explain me in DETAIL User talk:Sdm2211 16:02, 8 November 2016 (IST)

Comment User:Sdm2211 Thanks for pointing that out. That page should not exist either under the same guidelines. I will nominate for deletion. Domdeparis (talk) 11:03, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as with the other similar pages all up for AfD just now. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.